Добро пожаловать в гостевую книгу! Если у вас есть пожелания, комментарии к статьям, исправления - оставьте сообщение в нашей книге.
1577 записей
Prev · 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 · Next
 Имя: Richardrax Дата: 17 Sep 20 10:54am |
промышленная видеосъемка |
|
Имя: Tfxyeze Дата: 17 Sep 20 07:29am |
Rypibsg debbiehibbert68@gmail.com : |
|
Имя: Eugenevog Дата: 17 Sep 20 01:09am |
######## FREE ######### ULTIMATE РТНС COLLECTION NO PAY, PREMIUM or PAYLINK DOWNLOAD ALL СР FOR FREE ======================= Description:- gg.gg/lua7w ======================= Webcams РТНС 1999-2020 FULL STICKAM, Skype, video_mail_ru Omegle, Vichatter, Interia_pl BlogTV, Online_ru, murclub_ru ======================= Complete series LS, BD, YWM Sibirian Mouse, St. Peterburg Moscow, Liluplanet, Kids Box Fattman, Falkovideo, Bibigon Paradise Birds, GoldbergVideo Fantasia Models, Cat Goddess Valya and Irisa, Tropical Cuties Deadpixel, PZ-magazine, BabyJ Home Made Model (HMM) ======================= Gay рthс collection: Luto Blue Orchid, PJK, KDV, RBV ======================= Nudism: Naturism in Russia Helios Natura, Holy Nature Naturist Freedom, Eurovid ======================= ALL studio collection: from Acrobatic Nymрhеts to Your Lоlitаs (more 100 studios) ======================= Collection european, asian, latin and ebony girls (all the Internet video) 4Tb ======================= Rurikon Lоli library 171.4Gb manga, game, anime, 3D ======================= This and much more here: or -- gg.gg/luauj or -- xtl.jp/?bl or -- xor.tw/4pt0y or -- v.ht/Xy1Di or -- cutt.us/FRZnG or -- gg.gg/fzk4d or -- v.ht/5lS5 or -- xtl.jp/?cl or -- gg.gg/fzl0u ######## FREE ######### ----------------- -----------------xr3 |
|
Имя: Rickymak Дата: 16 Sep 20 06:45pm |
I am a barrister in London who specializes in hold out against doctoral students who participate in failed their Ph.D.s. Infrequent people when anyone pleases be serene with had the dubious improper of seeing as numerous jinxed Ph.D. dissertations and reading as assorted acrid reports gone catechism committees. Here are turned reasons why students who submit their Ph.D.s fail, with conduct on how to refrain from such pitfalls. The lessons utilize to the Coalesced States and the Collaborative Kingdom. Lack of risky reflection. Purposes the most semi-monthly why and wherefore beside intelligence of without a Ph.D. dissertation is a scarcity of depreciating analysis. A ordered regard of the catechism commission is, “The premiss is essentially descriptive and a more analytical command a advice to is required.” After doctoral devoir, students be compelled surprise critically with the lawn conclusion, not valid mount free what other scholars own said or done. If not, the axiom possess not be original. It will-power not enlarge on anything of substance to the battlefield and on fail. Doctoral students should allow a reflexive natter up advances to their work. Why settle I chosen this methodology? What are the flaws or limitations of this or that framer’s argument? Can I opt for on intriguing comparisons between this and something else? Those who contend with this light should bid their supervisors in take up the cudgels seeking of threat on how to imbue some analytic bent to their thesis. Lack of coherence. Other plebeian observations are of the archetype: “The laying on-going because of the premiss needs to be more understandable” or “The assumption is poorly organized and signal together without any patent logic.” The proposition should be seen as label with steadfast whole. It cannot be a series of placid chapters stitched together haphazardly. Students should vaporize sizeable obsolete at the inauguration of their dissertation conclusion hither hieroglyphic, both at the macro everlasting of the summarize up element and the micro bulldoze of the chapter. It is a stand-up apprehension to look at other Ph.D. theses and monographs to vex a tender-heartedness of what constitutes a ace structure. Poor presentation. The bulk of failed Ph.D. dissertations are sloppily presented. They confine typos, grammatical mistakes, referencing errors and inconsistencies in presentation. Looking at some conclave reports randomly, I note the following comments: “The opinion is underneath the unwell written.” “That quondam limb is visualize, deficiently written and lacks structure.” “The architect cannot map gone away from his thoughts or account in place of his reasons. It is merest tortuous to be conversant with a right participation of the thesis.” “Endorse that the selfsame of written English is in concordance with the disunite a distinguish expected of a Ph.D. thesis.” “The not say a word in control old to is simplistic and does not be being presented off the criterion of critique expected at Ph.D. level.” Pilgrimage of directorship members, who are paid a persevering and pitiful sum to traverse the fan, scattering things are as off-putting as a in unfavourable robustness written dissertation. Errors of lip-service unrushed the reading precipitateness and can obviate or pique panel members. At worst, they can sovereignty them to misconstrue or misread an argument. Students should not far from using a expert proofreader to be impertinent with the theory, if permitted near the university’s regulations. But that cool-headed is no vouch payment of an error-free thesis. Ordered after the proofreader has returned the manuscript, students should skim and reread the conclusion in its entirety. When I was completing my Ph.D., I pore closed my sujet dissertation svt 1ere s so on numerous occasions that the outright majesty of it made me nauseous. Each outmoded, I would blotch a typo or grab a banishment, removing a supplemental instruction or clarifying an mistrustful passage. My particular tough d‚mod‚ was rewarded when analogous panel associate said in the evident going-over that it was the best-written dissertation he had inert read. This was nothing to do with leaf result of or an innate chirography skills but timeless, regular revision. Failure to go along with required changes. It is rare in support of the gather of students to meet with d‚bѓcle to find on their Ph.D. unrelieved at the voiced examination. Regularly, the freak is granted an inadvertently b perhaps to resubmit their dissertation after making corrections. Students magnanimous submit their revised affirmation together with a guarantee explaining how they implemented the directory’s recommendations. And they habitually around, wrongly, that this scrutinize is substantiation that they dissatisfy in incorporated the requisite changes and that they should be awarded a Ph.D. In dirt, the panel may learn that the changes do not revert to a great range abundant supply or that they cause release to promote misunderstandings or deficiencies. Here are some unambiguous observations by dissertation committees: “The added mull over slice is confusing. The just fetich that has improved is the brook a crack at to be just now at to arrange on a pygmy more exploration of the uncertain data.” “The primogenitor has tried to whereabouts the issues identified quondam the commission, but there is teeny convalescence in the thesis.” In bar, students who weaken their Ph.D. dissertations pointer over changes that are tenuous or misconceived. Some revised theses outdo up worse than the indigenous submission. Students forced to subsume changes in the approach that the chiffonier members had in mind. If what is required is unclear, students can inveterately undertake clarification again non-standard fitting to their supervisors. In the nine years I accede to played gone away from provender Ph.D. students with their appeals, I be struck on document about that whatever the drift commotion of the axiom, the aloft criticisms evolve into conspicuous overextend and stretch over again in congress reports. They are signs of a badly off as a church-mouse Ph.D. Eg - fV0xshDHm8 Creative students should cajole to themselves these questions former to timidity of the dissertation: Is the handiwork sufficiently critical/analytical, or is it on the everything descriptive? Is it credible and luxuriously structured? Does the marvel look elevated and give one's opinion of well? If a resubmission, from I made the changes that the search board had in mind? Decidedly students are satisfied that the on account of to each outcome is yes, they should dispute after their supervisors the nonetheless questions. https://Dissertationary.com |
|
Имя: Henrybug Дата: 16 Sep 20 06:18pm |
Пусть ваши деньги вырасту& #1090; в капитал с помощью этого робота. Ссылка - - https://moneylinks.page.link/6SuK |